Equity is the Buzzward, Including NIH Funding
Updated: Jun 18
Recent data shows:
2% of NIH-supported institutions get about 53% of all research project grant dollars
10 top-funded institutions each get more dollars than do each of 35 to 40 entire states
With the goal of improved equity, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published the executive summary for a revised framework for peer reviewers for the NIH-R21 grants.
New framework
The new 3-factor structure for grant reviews includes:
Importance of the Research
Feasibility and Rigor
Expertise and Resources
Removal of criterion scores of Expertise and Resources removes consideration of an author/institutions “research track record."
Takeaway
Proponents say the proposal aims focus on scientific merit while reducing biases. Opponents say the new structure is merely a cosmetic reshuffling of existing criteria, and institution “track record should be considered.”
Recent Posts
See AllIn his book, The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right (2009), Atul Gawande makes a compelling argument that we can do better, using the simplest of methods: the checklist. Adapted from other p
The 2023 American College of Foot & Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) Annual Conference was last week in Los Angeles, CA. Here are some highlights, in case you missed it: New leadership. Dr. Eric Barp, DPM, FACF
In a small 10-patient study, Timothy R. Daniels et al. compared patients living with an ankle fusion on one side and a TAR on the other. When asked about their satisfaction with the procedures, most p
