top of page

[Puppy] Paper Mills Overtake Science

  • kshepherd72
  • Aug 20
  • 1 min read

Large scale scientific fraud is real. Some publishers report that up to one in seven of their submissions likely originate from “paper mill provenance.” According to a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the rate of fake papers generated by these operators roughly doubled every 1.5 years between 2016 and 2020.

 

Artificial intelligence blurs lines in research


Large language models are consuming scientific literature indiscriminately, mixing legitimate and fraudulent papers, which complicates distinguishing genuine science from fakes. This big data approach validates trends that researchers of shoddy papers have suspected for years. 

 

How big is the problem?


In 2020, 2,905 articles were retracted, while more than 4,500 papers were flagged as suspicious. After retracting more than 11,300 compromised papers, Wiley, a U.S. publisher with 1,600 journals, announced last year that it would shutter 19 publications, some of which showed signs of being overtaken by paper mills.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Denying the Denials: AI in Pre-Authorizations

The insurance side of AI   Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) does not require insurers to disclose how they make authorization decisions or how predictive technologies factor into the p

 
 
 
Ligament Augmentation in Lateral Ankle

Ligament augmentation in lateral ankle reconstructions got a big boost with the publication of a Level 1  paper  showing superior two- and five-year outcomes when using a ligament augment. Since then,

 
 
 

Comments


FIX Masthead 2000x318 v2.jpg
bottom of page