top of page

Assessing the Safety of Fibular Nailing

  • kshepherd72
  • Jul 23, 2025
  • 1 min read

by Vince Vacketta, DPM


Intramedullary fibular nailing (IMFN) offers unique advantages over traditional plate and screw techniques for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fibula fractures. However, the risk of iatrogenic soft tissue and nerve damage remains a concern. 


A cadaveric study evaluated the structured impact of a single IMFN construct in 10 specimens.


Study results


The study found that the peroneus brevis tendon was within 5 mm of the distal skin incision in all specimens and within 5 mm of the nail aperture in 60% of cases. The peroneus longus tendon faced moderate-to-high risk during syndesmotic screw placement in 90% of specimens. The superficial peroneal nerve was at high risk in 70% of specimens during distal anterior to posterior locking screw insertion. Additionally, the calcaneofibular ligament was damaged in three out of 10 specimens, with damage ranging from 14% to 64% of its width.


Key insights


While IMFN is minimally invasive, it can still cause iatrogenic injuries. Careful consideration of local anatomy and implant selection is imperative to avoid injury.

Recent Posts

See All
Subtalar Arthritis After Pilon

Pilon fractures frequently lead to ankle arthritis. However, the risk and severity of posttraumatic subtalar arthritis is not well documented. This is relevant considering the evolving trend of acute 

 
 
 
Don't Forget About the Foot

Foot injuries in polytrauma patients are often overlooked because life-threatening injuries take priority. A recent retrospective registry analysis conducted at Tampere University Hospital from 2016

 
 
 

Comments


FIX Masthead 2000x318 v2.jpg
bottom of page