top of page

Assessing the Safety of Fibular Nailing

  • kshepherd72
  • Jul 23
  • 1 min read

by Vince Vacketta, DPM


Intramedullary fibular nailing (IMFN) offers unique advantages over traditional plate and screw techniques for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fibula fractures. However, the risk of iatrogenic soft tissue and nerve damage remains a concern. 


A cadaveric study evaluated the structured impact of a single IMFN construct in 10 specimens.


Study results


The study found that the peroneus brevis tendon was within 5 mm of the distal skin incision in all specimens and within 5 mm of the nail aperture in 60% of cases. The peroneus longus tendon faced moderate-to-high risk during syndesmotic screw placement in 90% of specimens. The superficial peroneal nerve was at high risk in 70% of specimens during distal anterior to posterior locking screw insertion. Additionally, the calcaneofibular ligament was damaged in three out of 10 specimens, with damage ranging from 14% to 64% of its width.


Key insights


While IMFN is minimally invasive, it can still cause iatrogenic injuries. Careful consideration of local anatomy and implant selection is imperative to avoid injury.

Recent Posts

See All
Denying the Denials: AI in Pre-Authorizations

The insurance side of AI   Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) does not require insurers to disclose how they make authorization decisions or how predictive technologies factor into the p

 
 
 
Ligament Augmentation in Lateral Ankle

Ligament augmentation in lateral ankle reconstructions got a big boost with the publication of a Level 1  paper  showing superior two- and five-year outcomes when using a ligament augment. Since then,

 
 
 

Comments


FIX Masthead 2000x318 v2.jpg
bottom of page